Seeing yourself objectively: what self-awareness means and how to build it
CareOps editorial team · · 9 min read
Mental wellness information and service guidance published by CareOps.
About the CareOps editorial team
The CareOps editorial team publishes these guides. Sources are linked at the end of each article; examples are illustrative, not customer stories. Product descriptions refer to CareOps Maeumi. Publication and revision dates appear above.
Read our full editorial standards →“Can you be objective about me?” Problems that look obvious when a friend has them suddenly blur when they are your own. One compliment lifts you up, and one piece of criticism can sink the whole day. Seeing yourself objectively is the ability to step back a little in between. Here is what it means, how people who do it well tend to think, how to keep it apart from self-criticism and what you can practice today.
At a glance
- Seeing yourself objectively means looking at your actions, feelings, strengths and weaknesses from a distance, as an outsider might. In psychology it overlaps with self-awareness and self-distancing.
- Researchers split self-awareness into knowing yourself from the inside and knowing how others see you. The two move independently, so building only one leaves half the picture.
- Practices include writing things down, separating actions from interpretations, asking “what” instead of “why,” describing your situation in the third person and asking trusted people for feedback. Tearing yourself down is not the same as seeing yourself objectively.
What does seeing yourself objectively mean?
In everyday Korean, there is a common expression for this: looking at yourself from a distance, as if through someone else's eyes. It sounds like “I'm speaking sharply because I'm angry right now” or “I'm good at this task but clumsy at that one,” seeing yourself as you are without being swept along by feelings and judgments. In English, the closest everyday phrase is seeing yourself objectively, and the closest research term is self-awareness.
Psychology has studied this from a few angles. In 1972, Duval and Wicklund proposed the theory of objective self-awareness, whose core idea is that when attention turns to the self, we start comparing who we are now with our own standards (Silvia & Duval, 2001). The practice of stepping back from your own experience has been studied under the name self-distancing (Kross & Ayduk, 2017).
In a 2018 Harvard Business Review article, organizational psychologist Tasha Eurich and her team described two kinds of self-awareness. Internal self-awareness is how clearly you see your own values, aspirations, reactions and impact on others. External self-awareness is understanding how other people see you. The team wrote that they found virtually no relationship between the two. You can feel you know yourself well and still miss how others see you.
Seeing yourself objectively is often mentioned alongside metacognition, but they differ. Metacognition mostly refers to monitoring your own thinking and knowledge (whether you really know something, how you are thinking right now). Seeing yourself objectively is broader: stepping back from your whole self, including feelings, actions, strengths, weaknesses and how you come across to others.
Signs you see yourself clearly, and signs you don't
These are not categories of people. The same person can move between both columns depending on the situation, and anyone finds it hard to see themselves clearly when emotions run high.
| Situation | When it goes well | When it's hard |
|---|---|---|
| After a mistake | Pinpoints what went wrong | Ends at “I'm hopeless” |
| Hearing criticism | Sorts what fits from what doesn't | Accepts it all or rejects it all |
| Strong emotions | Notices “I'm angry right now” | Feelings seem like facts |
| Asked about strengths | Gives concrete examples | Draws a blank or exaggerates |
The inside view and the outside view see different things. In a study where 165 people were rated by themselves, friends and strangers and compared with behavioral tests (Vazire, 2010), people were the best judges of hard-to-observe traits such as anxiety, while friends were the best judges of traits loaded with evaluation, such as intellect. That is why seeing yourself objectively takes both looking inward and listening to others.
Eurich's team wrote that in interviews with highly self-aware people, the word “why” appeared fewer than 150 times while “what” appeared more than 1,000 times. Their explanation is that repeatedly asking “Why am I like this?” tends to produce answers that feel true but are often wrong, or to pull you into rumination. The team estimated that only about 10 to 15 percent of the people they studied met their criteria for self-awareness, which suggests it is something most of us need to practice.
When it goes too far: telling it apart from self-criticism
Looking at yourself naturally invites comparison with the self you want to be. That is why seeing yourself objectively can slide into a verdict that you fall short. If “being objective” means listing only your flaws, you are closer to harsh judgment than to an honest view. An objective view weighs what went well and what didn't with the same scale.
- Seeing yourself objectively: “I skipped about half of what I prepared in the presentation. I only rehearsed once.”
- Self-criticism: “I'm just bad at presenting. Everyone must have thought I was pathetic.”
- Objective and kind: “When I get nervous, I lose parts of my content. Next time I'll rehearse twice. And I did get through to the end.”
Seeing the facts as they are while speaking to yourself kindly, as in the third example, is self-compassion. For research on why self-compassion is not letting yourself off the hook but a source of energy to try again, see raising self-esteem and self-compassion.
How to see yourself objectively: five practices
- Write it down: when something stirs you up, jot it down that night. Separate what happened, what you did, what you thought and what you felt, and the tangle in your head starts to come apart on the page.
- Separate actions from interpretations: “I interrupted my coworker twice in the meeting” is an action; “I'm a rude person” is an interpretation. Actions can change, but interpretations pin you down with a single label. Mark each sentence you wrote as one or the other.
- Ask “what” instead of “why”: instead of “Why am I so sensitive?” ask “In what situations do I get sensitive?” and “What did I need then?” The answer points toward your next step rather than toward blame.
- Write in the third person: use your own name, as in “Minji is nervous about the presentation. What does Minji need right now?”, on paper or in your head. Writing advice as if the problem belonged to a close friend works the same way.
- Ask for feedback: ask one or two trusted people about a specific situation, such as “How do I come across in meetings lately?” Don't argue on the spot; write down what you hear and sort out what fits later.
The fourth practice has a fair amount of research behind it. In a paper combining seven studies (585 people), Kross and colleagues (2014) found that people who thought about a stressful situation using their own name or third-person language instead of “I” performed better according to observers on first-impression and public-speaking tasks, felt less distress, and saw upcoming stressors more as challenges than threats. Across three experiments (693 people), Grossmann and Kross (2014) showed that people reason more wisely about others' relationship problems than their own, and that this gap disappeared when they were asked to self-distance. The effect was the same for adults aged 20 to 40 and 60 to 80.
The first two practices share roots with the thought records of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). For how to catch the thoughts that pop up in a moment and separate them from facts, see automatic thoughts: examples and how to record them.
Is there a test for seeing yourself objectively?
Rather than a single test that measures self-objectivity, a more realistic approach is to use a tool that reflects your tendencies on a set scale. A Big Five personality check shows how high you are on extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism and openness, turning a vague “that's just how I am” into specific traits. If you show the results to someone close and ask, “What do you think?”, you can compare how you see yourself with how they see you.
The CareOps Big Five check is a 20-item version built from public-domain personality items (IPIP), and you can take it right away without logging in. It shows your five traits within your own answers rather than ranking you against others. To see how it differs from MBTI, read MBTI vs. the Big Five.
Try a self-assessment without signing inBrief Big Five · CareOps adaptationExplore the broad patterns of your personalityStart the check →If looking at yourself keeps ending in self-blame
If reflecting on yourself always ends with “I'm worthless,” and that feeling lasts more than two weeks while your sleep, appetite or daily life start to slip, don't carry it alone. Talk with a mental health professional. It may be low mood doing the judging rather than honest reflection.
If you want someone to help you step back
On your own, reflection can circle the same spot. CareOps Maeumi is an AI counseling app that runs sessions with approaches such as cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), helps you separate what happened from how you read it and look at it from another angle, and remembers past sessions so the next one picks up where you left off. Get the app
Frequently asked questions
- What does it mean to see yourself objectively?
- It means looking at yourself from a distance, as an outsider might, so you can see your actions, feelings, strengths, weaknesses and how you come across without being swept along by emotions or wishes.
- What is the psychology term for it?
- The closest terms are self-awareness and self-distancing. Duval and Wicklund's 1972 theory of objective self-awareness is also a related classic in social psychology.
- How is it different from metacognition?
- Metacognition mostly means monitoring your own thinking and knowledge. Seeing yourself objectively is broader, covering feelings, actions and how you come across to others. The two overlap, but the second is wider.
- Won't looking at myself objectively hurt my self-esteem?
- It can if you only hunt for flaws. An objective view weighs what went well and what didn't equally, and once you see the facts, you choose a next step in a kind tone. That way, seeing yourself clearly and self-compassion go together.
- Is there a book about self-awareness?
- Organizational psychologist Tasha Eurich, whose research is described in this article, wrote Insight (2017) about self-awareness. Before reading anything, one thing you can start today is picking one moment each day and writing down the action and your interpretation separately.
Sources
- Silvia & Duval (2001), Objective Self-Awareness Theory: Recent Progress and Enduring Problems, Personality and Social Psychology Review
- Eurich (2018), What Self-Awareness Really Is (and How to Cultivate It), Harvard Business Review
- Vazire (2010), Who knows what about a person? The self–other knowledge asymmetry (SOKA) model, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Kross et al. (2014), Self-talk as a regulatory mechanism: How you do it matters, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Grossmann & Kross (2014), Exploring Solomon's Paradox: Self-Distancing Eliminates the Self-Other Asymmetry in Wise Reasoning, Psychological Science
- Kross & Ayduk (2017), Self-Distancing, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
This guide shares mental wellness information. If you are in immediate danger, contact emergency services where you are. Support and contact information.